Legal Opinion
State v. Pierre
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 18, 1977No. 75-246C, CA 7742PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Defendant appeals from her conviction of the sale of an unregistered security, ORS 59.055, and contends that the sentence imposed by the court — a suspended five-year prison term and a fine of $5,000 — exceeded the maximum permissible by statute. Defendant contends that as a conviction under ORS 59.055 does not require proof of a culpable mental state, under ORS 161.105(2), she may be sentenced only for a violation which is punishable by a maximum fine of $250. ORS 161.635(3).
As part of its revision of the criminal code in 1971, the legislature enacted ORS 161.095(2), which provides:
"Except…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Blalock v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Moe v. CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Marshall v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RainoldiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. EmmichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. Von Eil EyerlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.