Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. McCaige

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1980No. E-7170, CA 14177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This suit for the specific performance of a contract to sell real property resulted in a decree in favor of the plaintiffs-buyers and a separate judgment requiring defendants Proksel to indemnify defendants McCaige for their litigation expenses. Defendants Proksel appeal.

This three-sided dispute is the result of two separate contracts to sell the same piece of property. The first contract, dated April 10, 1977, is between plaintiffs and defendants McCaige. It is an agreement by defendants McCaige to sell and plaintiffs to buy approximately 33 acres for $33,000. The agreement recites that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Crosetti Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Reed v. First Nat. Bank of GardinerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pacific Mill Co. v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Guillory Corporation v. Dussin Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Alk v. LaniniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Gottenberg v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Walker v. FeiringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Cameron v. Faszer Bros. & Sons, Inc. (In Re Faszer Bros. & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API