Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 28, 2001No. 2000-164; A114031PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Petitioner Norm Maxwell seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), which affirmed a decision of the Lane County Board of Commissioners approving an application for rezoning of property totaling approximately 32 acres from Rural Residential, 10-acre-min-imum parcel size (RR-10), to Rural Residential, 5-acre-mini-mum parcel size (RR-5). Maxwell v. Lane County, 39 Or LUBA 556 (2001). We conclude that LUBA erred in determining that the county need not consider the legal status of applicant’s parcels in connection with his application for rezoning and, consequently,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Mountain West Investment Corp. v. City of SilvertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Harris v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Delta Property Co. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015