Legal Opinion

Deante L. Harris, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2016No. ED103074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Chief Judge

Introduction

Deante Harris (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 amended motion for post-conviction relief. In his sole point relied on, Movant contends that the motion court erred by denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing because he pleaded facts unrefuted by the record that counsel improperly assured him he would receive eight to ten years’ imprisonment in exchange for pleading guilty, thus making the plea involuntary, and that, but for counsel’s deficient performance, Movant would have instead…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Whitehead v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Nesbitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Lynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ban v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Jeremy R. Durham v. Tennessee Registry of Election FinanceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  3. Keys v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API