Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2016No. ED 102415PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

Appellant Gene Whitehead (“Whitehead”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 241035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Whitehead píeáded guilty to one count of first-degree robbery and three counts of second-degree robbery and was sentenced to a total of 12 years’ imprisonment. Whitehead’s amended motion sought to set aside his guilty plea to first-degree robbery. On appeal, Whitehead contends the motion court erred.in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing because (1) plea…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. Vaca v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Meadors v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Rueger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Jacob A. Bergner v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Rodney simmons v. State of MissoruiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Kulhanek v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API