Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2011No. ED 95723PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Presiding Judge.

Antoine Smith (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because his plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him that he would have to serve eighty-five percent of the sentences he received for the forcible sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo 2000 1 attempted forcible rape, Section 564.011, first-degree assault, Section 565.050, and first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, convictions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Morales v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Isla Ballard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API