Smith v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Presiding Judge.
Antoine Smith (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because his plea counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him that he would have to serve eighty-five percent of the sentences he received for the forcible sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo 2000 1 attempted forcible rape, Section 564.011, first-degree assault, Section 565.050, and first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, convictions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Morales v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Isla Ballard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.