Legal Opinion

A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 2018No. SJC 12370PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

**419 This case concerns the proper construction of the termination for convenience clause in a contract between the **420 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. (Prime), a private fuel supplier. A termination for convenience clause permits a contracting public entity, under certain circumstances, to cancel a procurement contract without exposure to liability for breach of contract. See Maxima Corp . v. United States , 847 F.2d 1549 , 1552 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Termination for convenience clauses originated in Federal procurement contracts, and…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Squeri v. Mount Ida CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. Suzuki v. Abiomed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. Trs. of the Beechwood Vill. Condo. Trust v. United Stateslliance Fed. Credit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Doe, SORB No. 76819 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Covidien LP v. EschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API