Legal Opinion

State v. Longjaw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1988No. CC C86-02-30752, C86-02-30804; CA A41491; SC S34829; CC 68-922; CA A42384; SC S34918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases merely require a simple application of two Oregon statutes. But they also involve one of the most perplexing problems currently confronting the criminal justice system in this state. That problem is how adequately to provide and pay for appointed counsel for indigent defendants charged with violations of state criminal laws. The two cases at issue concern the calculation and payment of attorney fees of appointed counsel for indigent criminal defendants and do not involve the underlying substantive criminal law issues previously decided. State v. Longjaw, 88 Or App 471, 745 P2d 827…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Judy v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lee v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Digesti v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API