Legal Opinion

Stelzner v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 2001No. C0-00-715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Relators Donald and Donna Stelzner appeal from the Minnesota Tax Court’s decision affirming an order of the Commissioner of Revenue assessing Minnesota state income taxes, penalties, and interest for each of the taxable years from 1987 through 1993. On appeal to the tax court, the Stelzners argued that they were domiciled in Nevada, not Minnesota, and raised federal constitutional issues challenging the tax assessment. In the alternative, the Stelzners argued that the commissioner should be equitably estopped from collecting the taxes, penalties, and interest and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Hohmann v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API