Hohmann v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
This case arises from the Minnesota Tax Court’s dismissal of relator Andrew Hoh-mann’s appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to late filing. The parties do not dispute the facts in this ease — i.e., that the relevant appeal documents were not received by the tax court until after the filing deadline had passed. The sole legal issue before us is whether late filing of an appeal to the tax court deprives that court of subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that it does. We affirm.
In December 2008, the Commissioner of Revenue ordered Hohmann to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Stelzner v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Gonzales v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
3Cited by15 opinions
- Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue, Commissioner of Revenue, Relator v. Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, A15-422Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Frederick Farms, Inc. v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Soyka v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.