Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
We review the question of whether the MinnesotaCare tax on the gross revenues of health-care providers transacting business in Minnesota violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution because it allows an exemption for revenues received from other health-care providers who are also subject to the Minne-sotaCare tax. Relator Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. (Mayo) argues that the statute imposes an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce because it allows an exemption for intrastate transactions but not for interstate transactions. The tax court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Urban v. American Legion Department of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Busch v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.