Legal Opinion
United States Shoe Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 3, 1997No. 96-1210PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
The United States (“the government”) appeals from the December 4, 1995 decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting summary judgment to United States Shoe Corporation (“US Shoe”) and holding that the court possessed jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i), not 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a), that the Harbor Maintenance Tax (“HMT”) violates the United States Constitution and is therefore void as applied to exports. See United States Shoe…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Massachusetts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Stone Container Corporation, Stone Container International and Stone Container Savannah River Pulp & Paper, Plaintiffs-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.