Legal Opinion
Bauer v. Crotty
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 17, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-157PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs Arthur A. and Donna Bauer (Bauer) brought this negligence action against defendants Dennis Redman and Hazel Crotty (Crotty), alleging that defendant Dennis Crotty had negligently caused plaintiff Arthur Bauer to be injured in a collision with a third vehicle when Crotty made an unsafe left turn in front of Bauer’s truck. Crotty contended that Bauer, who was driving with a blood alcohol content of .28 or .29, was guilty of wanton contributory negligence. The jury found that Bauer had been 71% negligent and Crotty 29% negligent, and fixed Bauer’s full…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. ThudeArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Wareing v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Lerma v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Williams v. ThudeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.