Legal Opinion

Lerma v. Keck

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 16, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0555PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Alma Lerma (“plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s grant of Andrew and Tina Keck’s (“defendants”) motion for new trial. Plaintiff argues that Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2505(A), as construed by this court in Wareing v. Falk, 182 Ariz. 495, 897 P.2d 1381 (App.1995), violates the Arizona Constitution’s equal protection and special legislation provisions. We, however, conclude that the statute is constitutional and therefore affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff worked as a housekeeper at the Hyatt Regency Hotel. Using a passkey, she entered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Goodman v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API