Lerma v. Keck
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
Alma Lerma (“plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s grant of Andrew and Tina Keck’s (“defendants”) motion for new trial. Plaintiff argues that Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2505(A), as construed by this court in Wareing v. Falk, 182 Ariz. 495, 897 P.2d 1381 (App.1995), violates the Arizona Constitution’s equal protection and special legislation provisions. We, however, conclude that the statute is constitutional and therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff worked as a housekeeper at the Hyatt Regency Hotel. Using a passkey, she entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Goodman v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.