Legal Opinion

Heimke v. Munoz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1970No. 9968-PRPublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Howard Heimke and his wife, Juanita, brought this action as plaintiffs against Robert Lopez Munoz to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. From a jury’s verdict for the defendant and the judgment entered thereon, plaintiffs have appealed. The Court of Appeals, while expressing reservations, nonetheless followed the majority opinion in Layton v. Rocha, 90 Ariz. 369, 368 P.2d 444. We accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 11 Ariz.App. 126, 462 P.2d 819, vacated and judgment of the Superior Court reversed.

At the time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Alabam Freight Lines v. Phoenix Bakery, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API