Legal Opinion

Truesdale v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1964No. 39,171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss a pending appeal or in the alternative for an order limiting the issues to be considered on appeal. It appears that the action involves claims of respondents against appellants for damages resulting from breach of warranty or fraud in the sale of allegedly inferior gasoline and oil products. Respondents prevailed and appellants appeal from the trial court’s order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The transcript of the evidence consists of 630 typewritten pages which has been condensed to 35 printed pages in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Seerup v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Webster v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. GRUNDTNER v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Noltimier v. NoltimierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API