Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Talevi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 6, 1966No. File No. CV 4-6512-5446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiCenzo, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of New York City, brings this action to recover on a judgment in the sum of $1819.25, alleged to have been obtained against the defendant, a resident of Naugatuck, Connecticut, in the Civil Court of the city of New York.

The defendant's daughter and another minor leased an apartment in New York City from the plaintiff. The defendant signed, in the city of Naugatuck, Connecticut, a guarantee of the lease. *331Upon an alleged default by the tenants, the plaintiff instituted an action in the Civil Court of the city of New York against both minors and against the defendant as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Samson v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Lampson Lumber Co. v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. O'Leary v. Waterbury Title Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. City Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. SeftelConnecticut Superior Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lofts v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Unicon Investments v. Fisco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API