City Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Seftel

The plaintiff has sued to recover on a judgment alleged to have been obtained against the defendant in the Supreme Court of the state of New York. The defendant’s answer contains six special defenses, the last of which incoiporates the first five as separate counts, adds an allegation that the defendant is without adequate legal remedy, and, by way of cross-complaint, seeks a declaratory judgment that the judgment sued on is null and void and also an injunction preventing the plaintiff from enforcing it. The plaintiff demurs to the second to the sixth defenses inclusive and the…