Legal Opinion
State v. Baird
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 20, 1967PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam: The defendant William R. Baird telephoned the Chief of Police of the Borough of Preehold, told him that he wanted to test the constitutionality of N. J. 8. 2A:170-76, and that he wanted to be arrrested after he had made his planned demonstration. On September 10, 1966 he arrived in Preehold, parked his van in a parking lot, and when Mrs. Elizabeth Dean asked him for information on birth control, he led her to the van. There he had a display board of contraceptive devices and medicines and he began to explain them and their uses to Mrs. Dean. He was arrested and a complaint was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Redrup v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Princeton, NJ v. KuglerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Township of Chester v. PanicucciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Matter of FelmeisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Keuper v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.