Legal Opinion

Township of Chester v. Panicucci

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 N.J. 94 (1973)

299 A.2d 385

TOWNSHIP OF CHESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MARIO PANICUCCI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 11, 1972.

Supplemental memorandum filed October 30, 1972.

Decided January 22, 1973.

Mr. William E. Ozzard argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Ozzard, Rizzolo, Klein, Mauro & Savo, attorneys; Mr. Ozzard, on the brief).

Mr. James M. Kenihan argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Fullerton, Kenihan & Porfido, attorneys; Mr. Kenihan and Mr. Lawrence P. Cohen, on the brief).

Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Summer v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. State v. MeinkenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State v. CrawleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. MacK Paramus Co. v. Mayor and CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. GH v. Township of GallowayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API