Legal Opinion
Matter of Felmeister
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 29, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
SCHREIBER, J.
This attorney disciplinary proceeding comes before us on respondents’ motion to dismiss the charges on the ground that the Disciplinary Rule barring broadcast advertising, DR 2-101(D), is unconstitutional. Respondents concede that they intentionally violated DR 2-101(D) by radio advertisements, though fully cognizant that at that time we were reviewing the Rule and considering amendments to it. They contend that irrespective of our ongoing proceedings, their violations are of no consequence. We reject this contention and deny their motion.
*433P…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Petition of Felmeister & IsaacsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- John J. Robertelli v. New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics (075584)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- In re Allegations of Violations of Law & Administrative Code by A. Fiore & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- MIDDLESEX CTY. HEALTH DEPT. v. ImporticoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Bell v. Legal Advertising CommitteeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.