Legal Opinion
Redrup v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 8, 1967No. 3PublishedCited by 472 opinions
1Per curiam
These three cases arise from a recurring conflict — the conflict between asserted state power to suppress the distribution of books and .magazines through criminal or civil proceedings, and the guarantees of the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
I
In No. 3, Redrup v. New York, the petitioner was a clerk at. a New York City newsstand. A plainclothes patrolman approached the newsstand, saw two paperback books on a -rack — Lust Pool, and Shame Agent — and asked for them by name. . The petitioner handed him the books and collected the price of $1.65. As a result of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by472 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
467 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.