Legal Opinion

California Insurance v. Blumburg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 5, 1960No. 38184PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Judge.

As will be seen from the statement of facts above, the policy sued on in this case was issued by the defendant on April 28, 1958. The loss occurred on May 13, 1958, exactly 15 days after the policy became effective. The defendant’s contention with regard to the violation of the limitation on the radius of operations clause in the policy depended on proof that during the policy period the insured vehicles had made regular or frequent trips beyond their respective permitted radii of operation. The provision in the policy thus relied on was in the nature of a promissory warranty.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Lovejoy v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Manley v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Karp v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Lanier v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. BlakeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Colonial Penn Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Roebuck v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. Thrift-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API