Legal Opinion

Eickhoff v. Eickhoff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1993No. S93A0932, S93X0933, S93A1017, S93X1018PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

In 1986, appellant-plaintiff Ms. Nancy Anne Eickhoff and appellee-defendant Mr. Bruce Frey Eickhoff were divorced in Pennsylvania. During the pendency of their divorce action, they had entered into a settlement agreement. This settlement agreement provided that, upon appellee’s retirement, appellant was to “receive one-half of [appellee’s] pension and social security benefits, to be paid to her within one week of the day or days on which he receives them.” This settlement agreement was not incorporated into the final divorce decree. After the divorce, appellee moved to Georgia…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Haggard v. Board of Regents of University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Travelers Insurance v. BlakeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Z & L LUMBER OF ATLASBURG v. NordquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Watkins v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lee v. Green Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Beasley v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Wright v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Warren v. Board of Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API