Karp v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This was an action in assumpsit on an automobile insurance policy, tried in the municipal court by a judge without a jury. The trial judge found for the plaintiff in the amount of $500, and judgment was duly entered on the finding. Defendant appealed and assigns for error, (1) the finding, (2) the discharge of its rule for judgment non obstante veredicto, (3) the discharge of its rule for a new trial, and (4) the judgment. The judgment will be affirmed.

On April 20, 1935 defendant company issued to Barnett Karp, the plaintiff, its 'Combined Comprehensive Automobile…