Legal Opinion
Baker v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-154PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORBEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a number of railroads servicing the Northeastern part of the United States, ask us to deny enforcement of certain orders entered by the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) in Increased Waterborne Charge, North Atlantic, Pacific and Canadian Ports. 337 I.C.C. 534 (1970). 1 Specifically, the Commission found that a proposed increase, as set out in tariff schedules published by plaintiffs, had not been shown to be just and reasonable. Plaintiffs had proposed an increase in the charge from 12 cents to 16 cents per hundredweight on waterborne…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- PECO Energy Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Standard Fire Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Squaw Transit Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Interstate Contract Carrier Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1974
- Squaw Transit Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975