Legal Opinion

PECO Energy Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2002No. 22 MAP 2001, 23 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

Beneath the streets of Philadelphia lie miles and miles of gas pipelines, water and sewage conduits, electrical wiring, and telephone and television cables. When the city undertakes a street reconstruction project, these subsurface facilities, which are vital components of a system that delivers crucial utility services, often stand in the path of the city’s proposed work, and they must be protected, relocated, or removed. Without this utility work, street reconstructions would be unable to proceed. Conversely, but for the city street construction, the incidental…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Erie R. R. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Coalition for Affordable Utility Services & Energy Efficiency v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. ARIPPA v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API