David v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — Hon. F. B. G-aynor, Judge. Action at law aided by attachment against defendant, Bailey. J. U. Sammis intervened, claiming the attached property as assignee for the benefit of Bailey’s creditors. Plaintiff replied, contesting the validity of the assignment, claiming that it is void by reason of preferences. Intervener demurred to the reply, which demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
*7481 *746On February 27, 1894, plaintiff brought this action to recover of defendant, Bailey, the amount due and to become due upon twelve promissory notes executed by said Bailey, and the further sum of two hundred and twenty-nine dollars and three cents upon an open account. It alleged sufficient grounds for attachment, and thereupon a writ issued, which on February 28th was levied upon certain personal property of defendant, Bailey. April 16, 1894, one J. U. Sammis intervened in the action, claiming title and right to the possession of the property levied upon, under a deed of assignment executed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Van Patten v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Cadwell's Bank v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Kohn Bros. v. Clement, Morton & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finken v. Douglas J. W.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
- Creglow v. Creglow Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Fleischner v. Bank of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1898