Legal Opinion

People v. Denomme

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1899No. Cr. No. 425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Fresno County. Jeremiah Denomme was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Defendant, Jeremiah Denomme, was charged by information with the crime of murder, alleged to have been committed upon one C. B. Molbeek, at the county of Fresno. Upon his plea of not guilty a trial was had and a verdict of guilty of manslaughter returned, upon which he was adjudged to punishment for five years in the state prison. This appeal is from the judgment, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1. Appellant claims that the evidence does not justify the verdict. The homicide occurred in a saloon. Deceased was quite drunk, although able to walk. Shortly…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Sullivan v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Boreham v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. BurdetteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. CayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. State v. Paul RoushWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. MullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API