Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare Plan v. Willard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendanb-Appellant Melvin Willard appeals a judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan (“Plan Administrators”). The district court held that the relief sought by the Plan Administrators constituted “appropriate equitable relief’ under § 502(a)(3) of ERISA. Admin. Comm. of the Wal-Mart Assocs. Health & Welfare Plan v. Willard, 302 F.Supp.2d 1267, 1276 (D.Kan.2004). On appeal, Mr. Willard argues that the relief sought is not “appropriate equitable relief’ under § 502(a)(3) of ERISA, that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan v. Ferrer, Poirot and Wansbrough, Ferrer, Poirot and Wansbrough Steven MestemacherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Rasenack Ex Rel. Tribolet v. AIG Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Miller v. Monumental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health & Welfare Plan v. Shank Ex Rel. ShankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.