Legal Opinion
Kemp v. Liebel
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 20, 2017No. 1:14-cv-1728-SEB-DKLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana
This matter comes before us on cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Larry Kemp and Brian Woodring and by Defendant David Liebel. Dkt. Nos. 48 and 57, respectively. Plaintiffs, prisoners within the Indiana Department of Correction (“DOC”), seek an award of nominal and punitive damages against Mr. Liebel in his individual capacity for allegedly violating their First Amendment right to practice their religion through services and study…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kemp v. LiebelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Larry Kemp v. David LiebelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017