Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Liebel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 11, 2017No. 17-1314PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Larry Kemp and Brian Woodring were Jewish inmates at prisons operated by the Indiana Department of Corrections (“DOC”).1 In 2014, Kemp, and Woodring were transferred from one DOC facility to another in order to maintain a kosher diet. Plaintiffs allege that defendant David Liebel, the DOC Director of Religious and Volunteer Services, violated •the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment by failing to delay that transfer until the new facility offered opportunities for Jewish group worship and study. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Paige Ray-Cluney v. Charles PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Jeffrey Leiser v. Karen KlothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Dawn Hanson v. Chris LeVanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API