Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 12, 1938No. 14700PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice FishburnE.

This was an action for personal injuries, resulting from a collision of an automobile driven by the appellant, with the traffic marker or silent policeman placed and maintained in the center of the intersection of DeKalb and Campbell Streets, in the City of Camden.

The action was brought by authority of Section 7345 of our 1932 Code, and upon trial resulted in a nonsuit, granted on the motion of the respondent upon the ground that the appellant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

The accident occurred on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Cirsosky v. SmathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Speas Ex Rel. Shugart v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Mayor, Etc., of City of Vicksburg v. HarralsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. HaasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Osteen v. T.E. Cuttino Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Floyd v. Town of Lake CitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Flowers v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API