Legal Opinion

Osteen v. T.E. Cuttino Construction Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 12, 1993No. 23904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

We are asked to determine the enforceability of an arbitration clause contained in a standard form construction contract. The trial judge found that the arbitration clause was invalid under South Carolina law, and that the parties should proceed with their dispute in a judicial forum. We reverse.

I. FACTS

The underlying dispute arises out of the alleged breach of a contract entered into by appellant T.E. Cuttino Construction Company (Cuttino) and predecessors to respondents H. Graham Osteen, II and Julia R. Osteen (the Osteens) for the construction of a residence. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Episcopal Housing Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Toler's Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. Trident Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Soil Remediation Co. v. Nu-Way Environmental, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Tritech Electric, Inc. v. Frank M. Hall & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Hurst v. SandyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API