Legal Opinion
In Re Diday
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1993No. 92-SP-1295PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility
2Per curiam
This unopposed reciprocal discipline case is almost identical to In re Moorcones, 619 A.2d 983 (D.C.1993), which we follow here. The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent’s license to practice law be revoked to correspond with the revocation of his license by the state of Virginia, with leave for respondent to apply for reinstatement in the District of Columbia should he be reinstated by Virginia, or after the expiration of five years pursuant to D.C.Bar Rule XI, § 16, whichever of these…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re MoorconesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Matter of OtchereDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re WebbDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001