Legal Opinion
In Re Moorcones
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1993No. 92-SP-229PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal discipline case, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent’s license to practice law be revoked to correspond with the revocation of his license by the state of Virginia, with leave for respondent to apply for reinstatement in the District of Columbia should he be reinstated by Virginia, or after the expiration of five years pursuant to D.C.Bar Rule XI, § 16, whichever of these events occurs earlier.
The Board’s recommendation is based upon admissions by respondent in the Virginia proceedings establishing that he made personal use of funds in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re BrickleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re DidayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of OtchereDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.