Legal Opinion
Schwartz Nagle, Etc. v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 22, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The primary question is whether automobile tires and tubes are materials or supplies within the meaning of our statute which requires that a county government's contracts for "the furnishing of any materials, supplies or labor" shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, R.S. 40:25-2.
The purchasing agent of Middlesex County, by order of the Board of Freeholders, advertised for tires and tubes. The specifications were meagre, — for example, "Eight — 1100 x 20 — 12 ply, mud grip tires with tubes to match." Although plaintiff, offering Fisk tires and tubes, was the lowest responsible…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harlem Gas Co. v. . Mayor, C., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Armitage v. Mayor & Common Council of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Mayor of Newark v. BonnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Peter's Garage, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- A. C. Schultes & Sons v. Township of HaddonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Cardell, Inc. v. Tp. of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- SHORE GAS AND OIL CO., INC. v. Spring Lake Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Closter Serv. Stat. Inc. v. RIDGEFIELD PK. COM'RSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.