Legal Opinion

Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of Middletown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 2, 1994PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

Pursuant to a public advertisement for bids, plaintiff Wasserman’s Inc. (Wasserman’s) and defendant, Township of Middletown (the Township or Middletown), entered into a commercial lease for a tract of municipally-owned property. The agreement contained a clause providing that if the Township cancelled the lease, it would pay the lessee, Wasserman’s, a pro-rata reimbursement for any improvement costs and damages of twenty-five percent of the lessee’s average gross receipts for one year. In 1989, the Township cancelled the lease and sold the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Consultants, Incorporated v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Green v. Morgan PropertiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. Metlife Capital Financial Corp. v. Washington Avenue Associates L.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Platinum Management v. DahmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Karimi v. 401 North Wabash Venture, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API