Legal Opinion
A. C. Schultes & Sons v. Township of Haddon
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
'Wachenteld, J.
The query here is whether or not a con- . tract with a municipality for the construction and drilling of deep wells for increased water supply, at a cost exceeding $1,000, comes within, the statutory requirements providing for advertisement and the awarding of the contract, to the lowest bidder.
The Township of Haddon needed an additional water supply and accordingly advertised for bids which called for the construction of one test well and two completely finished wells at either the 200-foot level or the 400-foot level, depending upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peter's Garage, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Schwartz Nagle, Etc. v. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Town of Hammonton v. ElvinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Pucillo v. Mayor and Council of Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Riddlestorffer v. City of RahwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Dobson v. Rutgers, State UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- SHORE GAS AND OIL CO., INC. v. Spring Lake Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.