Legal Opinion

Mayor of Newark v. Bonnell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

On the 6th. day of August, 1892, the board •of street and water commissioners of the city- of Newark advertised for sealed proposals . for the -paving of certain streets. The specifications of the material to be furnished ’therefor, in each instance, called for the employment of genuine “'Trinidad Lake” asphaltum. The board,-in inviting these bids, expressly reserved “ the right to-accept-or reject any or •all proposals for the above work • as they might deem for the interest of the city.” :)

Proposals were received from two bidders, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hobart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. StormsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Saunders v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Ford v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Johns v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bye v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API