Mayor of Newark v. Bonnell
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
On the 6th. day of August, 1892, the board •of street and water commissioners of the city- of Newark advertised for sealed proposals . for the -paving of certain streets. The specifications of the material to be furnished ’therefor, in each instance, called for the employment of genuine “'Trinidad Lake” asphaltum. The board,-in inviting these bids, expressly reserved “ the right to-accept-or reject any or •all proposals for the above work • as they might deem for the interest of the city.” :)
Proposals were received from two bidders, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hobart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. StormsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Saunders v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Ford v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Johns v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Bye v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.