Legal Opinion
Admiral Financial Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2003No. 93-489CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
In a previous opinion of October 21, 2002, the Court ruled in summary judgment on the question of liability in this case. See Admiral Fin. Corp. v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 247 (2002). As other Courts have held in Winstar-related cases, we found that a valid, binding contract existed between the Government and Plaintiff, Admiral Financial Corporation. Specifically, we held that the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) and its successor, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), were contractually bound to count supervisory goodwill resulting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Admiral Financial Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Granite Management Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Caroline Hunt Trust Estate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Granite Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.