Legal Opinion
Castle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2002No. Nos. 01-5047, 01-5050PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is a Winstar-related case. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims,” or “trial court”) held that two of the plaintiffs, John K. Castle (“Castle”) and Leonard M. Harlan (“Harlan”), were parties to a contract that the government breached by enacting the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIR-REA”), Pub.L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, and its implementing regulations. Castle v. United States, 42 Fed. Cl. 859, 861-64 (1999) (Smith, C.J.). Also on these motions, the Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Teg-Paradigm Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.