Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

S. v. . Fisher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN and HOKE, JJ., concurring; CLARK, C. J., dissenting. The three defendants, Mutual Aid Banking Company, John H. Fisher, and A. Hatke, were indicated in the court below for unlawfully selling liquor, the indictment containing two counts, one for selling intoxicating liquor to a person to the jurors unknown, and the other for selling such liquor to Carl Spencer, a person under the age of 21 years. The defendant A. Hatke, a member of the firm of A. Hatke Co., of Richmond, Va., wholesale liquor dealers of that city, was not on trial, and the other defendants severally pleaded "not guilty" to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. American Steel & Wire Co. v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. . DelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Ares Distilling Co. v. Mutual Aid Banking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API