State v. . Davis

This was an indictment against defendant for having in his possession, for the purpose of sale, spirituous liquor, contrary to law, as declared by the statute of the State forbidding it (Public Laws of 1913, ch. 44, sec. 2). The defendant was convicted, and appealed.

His only exception is that “the judge erroneously told the jury that a violation of any of the provisions of this section (No. 2) of the act would make the defendant guilty of a misdemeanor.” "We have stated the contention strictly according to his brief. It is the only one mentioned therein, and all other assignments of error,,…