State v. . Delk
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
From the finding of the jury there was an acquittal of the defendant on the charge of larceny of the $63.75 in money.
In S. v. Fisher, 162 N. C., 550 (553), speaking to the subject, we find: “It is conceded, as we understand, that the special verdict was returned upon the second count, and there is no verdict upon the first count. It was held in S. v. Taylor, 84 N. C., 773, that 'where the jury find a defendant guilty of one count, and say nothing in their verdict concerning other counts, it will be equivalent to a verdict of acquittal as to them.’ ” S. v. Hampton, 210 N. C., 283 (284).
At tbe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- State v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- State v. . KirklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. . ChoateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977