Legal Opinion
Jaqua v. Nike, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 15, 1993No. C920052CV; CA A77391PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint for failure to commence his action within the statute of limitations. ORCP 21A(9). In reviewing the granting of a motion to dismiss, we assume the truth of all allegations, as well as any inferences that may be drawn, and view them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Machunze v. Chemeketa Community College, 106 Or App 707, 712, 810 P2d 406, rev den 312 Or 16 (1991). Our review of a motion to dismiss based on the expiration of the statute of limitations, ORCP 21A(9), is limited to what appears on the face of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Derenco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Owen v. BradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- MacHunze v. Chemeketa Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Staley v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Volt Services Group v. Adecco Employment Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Yanney v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.