Legal Opinion

Volt Services Group v. Adecco Employment Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 2001No. 9901-00240; A109509PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant on plaintiffs claims for intentional interference with economic relations, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s conclusions that there was no genuine issue of material fact with respect to any of its claims and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a portion of its motion to compel production of documents and its motion to file an amended complaint. We reverse the summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Nike, Inc. v. Eugene McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Lazer Spot, Inc. v. Hiring Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  5. Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API