Legal Opinion
Littlebear v. Advanced Bionics, LLC
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 19, 2012No. Case No. 11-cv-418-GKF-PJCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendant Advanced Bionics’s motion for summary judgment and memorandum of law in support. (Doc. # 40).
I. Background
Advanced Bionics manufactures cochlear implants, a medical device for the deaf. The model at issue is the HiRes90K. The HiRes90K is designed to provide useful hearing to people with severe hearing loss via electrical stimulation. The external components include a sound processor, a head piece, and a cable. The internal components include a surgically implanted receiver and electrode array.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thorn v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- Garcia v. Bayer Essure, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Keim-Bacon v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Warmoth v. Medtronic IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023