Legal Opinion
Michelle L. LINDALE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOKHEIM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 26, 1998No. 97-1591, 97-2265PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
Michelle Lindale brought suit against her former employer, Tokheim Corporation, claiming that it had discriminated against her on grounds of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. sec. see.2000e et seq., and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). She obtained a jury verdict for $100,000 in compensatory damages, and $250,000 (reduced by the judge to $200,000) in punitive damages, under Title VII, and some additional equitable relief, including $2,400 in double damages, under the Equal Pay Act. The Title VII violations involved constructive…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Arthur S. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Marcos Gray v. Marcus HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Calvin Thomas v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Gary Millbrook v. Ibp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Siegfried Herrnreiter v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Fischer v. Avanade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.