Bell Sports, Inc. v. Yarusso
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
This is an appeal from a Superior Court denial of judgment as a matter of law, or alternatively, for a new trial following an award of damages in a product liability action. The defendant-appellant claims error on the part of the trial judge in ruling on the qualifications of plaintiffs expert witnesses and in permitting the substance of that testimony to establish a jury question on claims for breach of warranty. The appellant further asserts that the jury verdict was internally inconsistent and that the Superior Court should have declared a mistrial after discharging a juror…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Davis v. MauteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Wien v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Goodridge v. Hyster Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.